The stealthy murder game Mark of the Ninja is, but it's also getting up there in years. Mark of the ninja remastered. Mark of the Ninja: Remastered will go for $20, although you can pick it up at a 15 percent discount if you pre-purchase on Steam. Now we've got a more properly detailed look at what the updated version will deliver, and a release date of.The new version of the game will include the Dosan's Tale DLC that was released for the 2013 Special Edition of the game, which adds a new character, level, items, and developer commentary. The graphics have been updated to support 4K resolution, the soundtrack has been remixed and remastered in 5.1 audio, and an unlockable New Game+ mode will add 'new challenges and rewards.' To address that, Klei announced back in March that a was in the works and would be out later this year.

QT wouldn't need to curve at all, the ships computer would, in simple terms, calculate the time your travel will take, calculate where your destination will be in that time, and travel to that point so you meet it at the right place at the right time. Ingame you wouldn't even need to know this was happening.Regarding being left in the dust? If you're close enough to a planetary body with sufficient gravity you can orbit it. If you leave its Sphere of Influence, where its gravity stops pulling you toward it, you will still orbit whatever IT was orbiting. Be that a planet if you were by a moon, or the sun if you were orbiting a planet.

So you'll still move in a relitively close orbit to whatever you were close to, but will drift away given sufficient time.I highly suggest the game Kerbal Space Program to learn more about orbital mechanics and route calculation. You seem knowledgeable, how could the game simulate orbital mechanics for the player in a system where all objects are in motion, when the game requires speed limits locked to a local 'stationary' or 'speed 0'?

Some quick googling shows Low Earth orbit is about 7790 m/s at 200km altitude - much faster than ships can travel in game (with the planet's centre as the speed '0' reference point).So the ships being too slow is one problem, another is that in reality there is no speed 0 or 'stationary', or speed limits up to light speed, but the game requires these. Logically it would be the center of the local massive object, planet, moon etc. Which itself is in orbit around the star. What would happen when you leave a planet to go to an orbiting moon, how would the game seamlessly change your 'stationary' reference from the planet to the moon?

Can this be done by having your '0' be a point in space that is the point where gravity is balanced between local massive objects?Will we always need a mechanic such as quantum travel (or supercruise in elite dangerous for another example) to move the player into a separate playspace for each object with it's own '0' reference? Or will we be able to use orbital mechanics if we wanted to travel without QT for some reason. Maybe using low energy transfers for slow and cheap unmanned freight ships or something.Probably could have explained better, I'm not a scientist:P. You explained yourself well enough honestly:)So the biggest problem here is that a game like Star Citizen doesn't treat orbital mechanics properly, nor general spaceflight at all.

Persistent property in Star Citizen comes in various types such as ships, weapons, vehicles, and land. Land ownership works via permanent control of an area or outpost. Outposts in Star Citizen are permanent player constructed housing that can be placed at a remote location. This means there are several types of land where players can place. Star Citizen Outage map. Star Citizen is a massively multiplayer, space trading and combat computer game for Microsoft Windows and Linux.

In the real world if you want to go down to a planet, you don't point yourself to the place on the planet (down) and fire thrusters to go towards that point, you fire your thrusters directly 'forward'. Doing so reduces your velocity which in turn makes you go closer to the planet in time.And that's the crux right there. In the real world things take time, to go faster requires more fuel so it's often a case of time vs cost. If nothing is time critical you can use as little fuel as possible and go slowly to your destination, gradually increasing your altitude.

But if you want to go higher, faster? Then you burn more fuel. In a game like Star Citizen there is no 'Time Speedup' (as there is in Kerbal Space Program) to make slow things go fast. So they can't make it 'proper' per say as things would take too long and be too complicated. They want it to be fast and fun.So.

They skip it altogether. Here you are essentially never 'moving' when you're at a dead stop. If you stop, you stay exactly where you were. IRL if you 'stop' (and by that I mean you kill all of your horizontal velocity) you fall straight down to whatever you are orbiting as gravity pulls you. IRL if you fire thrusters pointing directly down to a planet from orbit you will simply change your orbit, not go down to the planet.The only caveat is that IF we had powerful enough engines, to make ourselves go fast enough, then flight such as it is in Star Citizen would be more possible.

So perhaps that's what they've gone with. Perhaps by stopping in SC some thrusters are simply powerful enough to maintain your position regardless of gravity's effects on your ship, I dunno honestly. If you can go fast enough I guess a lot of these things don't apply anymore.One thing that does always get me though is that if you fire thrusters in one direction constantly you would get a huge amount of speed. But IRL you would need to spend half of the travel time firing backwards in order to come to a stop at your destination:)​'Or will we be able to use orbital mechanics if we wanted to travel without QT for some reason.' The distances we are talking about here are absolutely staggering, to travel such distances in a normal way without something such as QT would take months if not years IRL, in-game with their speeds it would still take days or longer of constant travel.​I'm pretty tired, sorry if I didn't answer everything or to your satisfaction, just ask again and I'll try again:P. It’s really cool that we have a dedicated community that is willing yo help us bridge the time until all systems are released.

Until then it is important to remember, that the planets won’t all be in the Stanton System when the game is released, Delamar for example will be in the Nyx System. Using resources to make a temporarily useful map seems like it would garner more negative than positive attention from the community, and rightly so. The dev team made the right choice in my opinion.